Make vs Zapier vs n8n for a small business: how each one charges, and when each one wins
Short answer
For short workflows at small-business volume, Make is usually the cheapest start: its Free plan gives 1,000 credits a month with webhooks and multi-step scenarios, and Core starts at $12/month (prices checked 2026-09-28). Zapier wins when an app is only on Zapier or a non-technical owner maintains it; n8n wins for long, high-volume workflows (one execution per run) or self-hosting. The units differ — Make counts every module, Zapier successful actions, n8n whole runs — so price your own workflow in each.
Make charges credits, Zapier tasks, n8n executions (or nothing self-hosted). Free tiers, learning curve and when each wins, priced on vendors' own pages.
Disclosure: links marked "paid link" pay us a commission from the vendor if you sign up. Your price is unchanged, and every file here works without them. How we choose tools →
All three tools do the same basic job: something happens in one app, and a chain of steps runs in others. A form is submitted, a row is written, a message goes out. For a small business the difference is not what they can do. It is how they count what you do, what the free tier leaves out, and who has to maintain the thing a year from now.
We build every blueprint on this site in Make and we are a Make affiliate, so read this page with that in mind. We have tried to be fair: below are the cases where Zapier or n8n is the better choice, and every price and limit comes from the vendor's own pricing page or documentation, checked on 28 September 2026 and linked at the bottom. Prices change; check them again before you commit.
- 1,000credits a month on Make's Free plan, with at most 2 active scenarios (checked 2026-09-28)make.com/pricing
- 100tasks a month on Zapier's Free plan, with two-step Zaps only (checked 2026-09-28)zapier.com/pricing
- 2,500workflow executions a month on n8n Cloud Starter, €20/month billed annually (checked 2026-09-28)n8n.io/pricing
- €0n8n Community Edition, self-hosted — you run and maintain the server (checked 2026-09-28)n8n docs
How each one charges
This is the part that decides the bill, and the three models are genuinely different. The same automation can cost three units in one tool, two in another and one in the third.
Make: a credit for (almost) every module that runs
Make bills in credits. Each action a scenario performs — reading from a webhook or an app, searching, creating, updating, transforming data — uses credits, and most actions use one. A trigger that checks an app for new data uses one operation per check, whether or not it finds anything. Some AI modules use more than one credit. When a module returns several items, every module after it runs once per item, so a search that finds ten rows multiplies the rest of the scenario by ten. If you run out mid-month, extra credits cost 25% more than the credits in your plan.
Zapier: a task for every successful action
Zapier bills in tasks. A task is counted when an action completes successfully; failed actions are not counted. Triggers, polling for new data and Zapier's own built-in tools — Filter, Formatter, Paths, Delay, Looping and others — do not use tasks. That makes Zapier's unit "cheaper" per step than Make's: in a Zap, only the steps that do something in another app count.
n8n: one execution per run, however many steps
n8n Cloud bills per workflow execution: one full run of a workflow counts once, regardless of how many steps it has or how much data it moves. A ten-step workflow costs the same as a two-step one. The self-hosted Community Edition has no usage bill at all — you pay for the server, and you are the one who installs, updates, secures and backs it up.
| Make | Zapier | n8n | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Units per lead | 3 credits (webhook + row + message) | 2 tasks (the trigger is free) | 1 execution |
| Runs on the free tier? | Yes — webhooks, routers and filters are on Free | No — needs a multi-step Zap, and webhooks are a paid feature | Cloud: 14-day trial only. Self-hosted: yes |
| Leads a month on the entry tier | Free: ~333 (1,000 ÷ 3) | Professional 750 tasks: ~375 (750 ÷ 2) | Starter: 2,500 |
| Entry tier price (checked 2026-09-28) | Free; Core from $12/month for 10,000 credits | Professional from $19.99/month billed yearly ($29.99 monthly) for 750 tasks | Starter €20/month billed annually |
Read the table with care. It is one automation. A workflow with many steps and high volume tilts towards n8n, because it pays per run. A workflow full of filters and formatting tilts towards Zapier, because those steps are free there. A short workflow at small-business volume — which is most of what a consultant builds for clients — is where Make's free tier and low entry price are hardest to beat.
The free tiers, side by side
| Make | Zapier | n8n | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier (checked 2026-09-28) | 1,000 credits/month | 100 tasks/month | No free Cloud plan; free self-hosted Community Edition |
| Workflows on the free tier | 2 active scenarios | Unlimited Zaps, two steps each | Unlimited (self-hosted) |
| Fastest schedule on the free tier | Every 15 minutes | Polling every 15 minutes | Your server |
| Webhooks on the free tier | Yes (no plan restriction in Make's webhook docs) | No — Professional and up | Yes (self-hosted) |
| First paid step (checked 2026-09-28) | Core: from $12/month, 10,000 credits, unlimited active scenarios, 1-minute scheduling | Professional: from $19.99/month billed yearly, multi-step Zaps, webhooks, 2-minute polling | Starter: €20/month billed annually, 2,500 executions, 5 concurrent |
| App catalogue | 3,000+ apps | 9,000+ apps | All integrations on every plan; code and HTTP requests for the rest |
The learning curve
This part is our experience, not a vendor figure. Zapier is the easiest to start: a Zap reads top to bottom like a recipe, and most people build their first one without help. Make asks for one more idea up front — data moves as bundles, and a module runs once per bundle — but in return you see the whole scenario on one canvas and can click any module after a run to see exactly what went in and out. That view is why we build client work in Make: when something breaks, you can point at the step. n8n is the most technical of the three. It is comfortable with JSON and code steps, and n8n's own documentation says self-hosting requires technical expertise for installation and configuration, and that maintenance is your responsibility.
When Zapier is the better pick
- The app you need is only on Zapier. Its catalogue is roughly three times the size of Make's. Check your client's CRM, booking tool and invoicing tool before choosing.
- The person maintaining it is not technical and will never open a canvas. A linear Zap is easier to hand over.
- The workflow is mostly filters, formatting and branching with one or two real actions. Those built-in steps do not use tasks on Zapier; in Make each one is a module that uses credits.
- The client already pays for Zapier. Moving a working system to save a few dollars a month is rarely worth the migration risk.
When n8n is the better pick
- Long workflows at volume. When a run has fifteen steps and happens thousands of times a month, paying per execution instead of per step changes the bill by an order of magnitude.
- The data must stay on infrastructure you control, or the client already runs servers and has someone who looks after them.
- You want to write code inside the workflow. n8n lists JavaScript and Python code steps among its developer tools.
- You build for clients on your own instance. n8n's licence FAQ allows it under the free Community licence as long as the clients cannot create or edit the workflows; hosting n8n for clients to build their own workflows is not allowed.
When Make is the better pick — and what to watch
For a small business or a solo consultant building three- and four-step automations — a lead alert, a follow-up, an invoice reminder — Make is our default. Multi-step scenarios with routers, filters and webhooks work on the free plan, so you can build and prove the whole thing before paying anything. The first paid tier is inexpensive and removes the two limits that bite: two active scenarios and a 15-minute schedule.
- Two active scenarios on Free is the real ceiling. A client with a lead alert, a follow-up and an invoice reminder already needs Core.
- Polling triggers cost credits even when there is nothing new. A trigger that checks every 15 minutes runs 96 times a day — about 2,880 checks in a 30-day month, almost three times the Free allowance, before a single lead arrives. Use a webhook wherever the source can send one.
- A scenario stuck in a loop can burn a month of credits quickly. Set a sensible limit on search and watch modules, and look at the credit counter after the first real runs.
If Make fits, this is the link we use; the free plan is enough to build and test every blueprint on this site: Sign up (one month of Core free) → paid link · we earn a commissionPaid link. If you sign up through it we earn a commission from Make; your price is the same, and the link gives you one month of Core free.
What one scenario looks like in practice
The cost table above was worked out on this blueprint. It is three modules — a webhook, a Google Sheets row and a Telegram message — and it is the first thing most consultants set up for a client.
Lead comes in → logged → alert. No hands.
A form on the client site sends a lead; it is logged and an alert reaches Telegram in seconds. The first automation every consultant sets up.
Blueprint, steps and caveats → · Watch the tutorial on YouTube
Get all 27 blueprints in one ZIP, by email
Tally form → lead log → Telegram alert. The free version of the lead alert
No website form, no CRM, no paid tool. A free Tally form posts to Make; the lead lands in Google Sheets and Telegram pings sales in seconds.
A decision in four questions
- Is every app you need available in the tool? If only one tool has a native module for the client's core system, that usually decides it.
- Who maintains it after you leave? A non-technical owner points to Zapier; a technical team with servers points to n8n; a consultant on a retainer is well served by Make.
- What does one run look like? Count the steps, then multiply by runs per month in each tool's unit — credits per module, tasks per action, one execution per run.
- Can the source send a webhook? If yes, all three can react instantly. If not, you are polling, and polling frequency becomes part of the price.
Estimate your Make credits (free calculator)Pick the automations you need and your monthly volume; see the credits and the Make plan that fits
Get an alert when a Make scenario failsWhat Make emails you, the error route that tells you, and one error inbox for every scenario
Is Make cheaper than Zapier?
For short workflows at small-business volume, usually yes: Make's free plan runs multi-step scenarios with webhooks, and Core starts at $12/month for 10,000 credits, against Zapier Professional from $19.99/month billed yearly for 750 tasks (prices checked 2026-09-28). But the units differ. Make counts every module, including the trigger; Zapier does not count triggers or its built-in filters and formatters. Price your own workflow in both units before deciding.
Is n8n free?
The self-hosted Community Edition is free to use under n8n's Sustainable Use License; you pay for and maintain the server. n8n Cloud is paid, starting with Starter at €20/month billed annually for 2,500 executions, with a free trial (checked 2026-09-28).
Can I run a small business on a free plan?
On Make, a small one: 1,000 credits and two active scenarios cover a lead alert and one more automation at low volume. On Zapier, the free plan allows 100 tasks and two-step Zaps only, so anything with more than one action needs Professional. n8n has no free Cloud plan (limits checked 2026-09-28).
Can I move my automations from one tool to another later?
Not by importing. A Make blueprint, a Zap and an n8n workflow are different formats, so moving means rebuilding each automation. Keep the logic simple and documented — which sheet, which columns, which message — and the rebuild is an afternoon, not a project.
Which one should a consultant learn first?
The one your clients already use. If they use none, Make is a reasonable default for small clients: the free plan lets you build a complete proof, and the canvas makes it easy to show a client what runs and why.
- Make — Pricing (plans, credits, active scenarios, scheduling interval, execution limits)
- Make Help Center — Credits
- Make Help Center — Operations (trigger checks, bundles)
- Make Help Center — Webhooks
- Make Help Center — Adjustments to plans and pricing (extra credits cost 25% more)
- Zapier — Plans & Pricing (tasks, two-step Zaps, polling time, webhooks by plan)
- n8n — Plans and Pricing (executions, Starter and Pro, Community Edition)
- n8n Docs — Choose how to use n8n (Cloud vs self-hosted, free trial)
- n8n Docs — Community license FAQ (what the Sustainable Use License allows)
In this series
- Is Make's free plan enough for a small business? The limits, our 21 automations measured against them, and when Core is worth paying for
- Make credits explained: what one operation costs in six real automations
- How to import a Make blueprint (and fix "invalid JSON" and missing-connection errors)
- Get an alert when a Make scenario fails: what Make already sends, the error route that tells you, and one error inbox for every scenario (free blueprint)


